Tariff-fuelled volatility killing private equity optimism as deal flows squeezed

Tariff-fuelled volatility killing private equity optimism as deal flows squeezed


[SINGAPORE] In just three months, private equity markets’ initial optimism for a busier year has largely dissipated. Instead, the turmoil unleashed on global financial markets by US President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs is quashing activity in private equity (PE), particularly as billions of dollars worth in mergers and plans for initial public offerings (IPOs) are halted.

Managers of PE funds, also known as general partners (GPs), rely on deal flow to exit and generate returns for their investors, which typically include pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and insurers. The cautious mood in PE is a vast turnaround from the anticipation that the second Trump administration would fan increased activity in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and IPOs amid expectations of fewer regulations and lower taxes.

“The level and the broad nature of the tariffs have thrown a wrench into that (optimism)… but we will have to wait and see how things evolve. But yes, in the near term, the exit activity that was supposed to be led by IPOs and M&A has come to a halt,” Nitin Gupta, managing partner at Flexstone Partners, an affiliate of Natixis Investment Managers, told The Business Times.

Nitin Gupta of Flexstone Partners says that the sweeping US reciprocal tariffs have brought exit activity from IPOs and mergers to a halt in the near term. PHOTO: FLEXSTONE PARTNERS

Together with the potential extension of the longest drought in distribution since the global financial crisis, GPs could turn to other exit options, she added. Distribution refers to the capital that GPs return to investors.

BT in your inbox

Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.

“We will likely see non-IPO exits pick up first. GP-led secondaries and continuation vehicles are also increasingly being used.”

Audrey The of Cambridge Associates says that the longest distribution drought since the global financial crisis, and the ongoing public market volatility, are leading PE firms to seek other exit options. PHOTO: CAMBRIDGE ASSOCIATES

GPs can create liquidity by leaning on the secondary market, one where investors can exit early from their commitments by selling to players such as other GPs, institutional investors and high net-worth individuals.

Booming secondary market

Global activity in secondary deals in what was previously a niche market has surged in the past few years, as higher interest rates and a slowdown in dealmaking squeezed the US$4 trillion buyout industry. Last year, the secondary market boomed, with the volume of transactions surging 45 per cent from 2023 to a record high of US$162 billion.

Private market data provider PitchBook said that there has been an overhang of US$1.5 trillion in PE globally that has been committed but not deployed as at the end of 2023. With the need to deploy capital, GPs and their investors are taking a more active stance in managing their portfolios, said Jamil Raza Syed, private equity leader at Deloitte South-east Asia.

“Investment committees are scrutinising potential deals more rigorously, particularly focusing on a company’s vulnerability to supply chain disruptions and tariff exposure,” he added.

Despite the ongoing uncertainty, GPs can still unearth investment opportunities. For instance, companies in sectors that tariffs are taking aim at could see their valuations reduced. Such a scenario could “either deter deals or create opportunities for buyers to purchase distressed assets”, Jamil noted. “Additionally, some businesses may enter the market as owners no longer wish to endure further volatility.”

Jamil Raza Syed of Deloitte Southeast Asia says that private equity firms are taking a closer look at potential deals, zooming in on companies’ vulnerability to supply chain disruptions and tariff exposure. PHOTO: DELOITTE

Smaller and mid-sized PE deals, which Schroders Capital defines as those involving companies with an enterprise value of less than US$1 billion each, are likely to stand out.

Providing good opportunities

Such companies are “attractively priced and less affected by geopolitical and trade conflicts”, Nils Rode, chief investment officer at Schroders Capital, said in an Apr 14 report. Infrastructure investments related to renewable energy in Europe and Asia provide good opportunities as well, he added, calling them “the most attractive” given the pushback from the current Trump administration.

Schroders is also positive towards real estate equity. Citing rising evidence of positive deal flow and pricing, Rode explained, “performance is expected to be sequential across markets, and we believe that 2025 will be a strong vintage year for deployment despite the impact of tariff escalations”.

Private credit, through which non-bank players lend to companies without buying equity, could also benefit from the current market turmoil. This is particularly if banks tighten lending to companies that might be hurt by tariffs, said market players.

“If there is any pullback in the traditional bank lending channels, private credit will be able to step in… This environment can also create dislocation in the credit markets which can benefit opportunistic credit managers,” said The from Cambridge Associates.

Schroders sees “promising opportunities” in specialty finance, asset-based lending and infrastructure debt, which offer steady and high-income cashflows. “The uncorrelated nature of these investments delivers a disproportionately beneficial outcome in an environment in which macro-economic conditions are uncertain or deteriorating,” Rode added.

Still, Deloitte’s Jamil cautioned that demand for private credit could shrink temporarily, if companies pause significant capital spending as they assess the impact tariffs would have on their supply chains and earnings.

In that scenario however, specialists in distressed debt – a type of private credit – could find opportunities as “some businesses may struggle with sudden changes to their operating models”.

To be sure, Flexstone’s Gupta pointed out that credit markets remain liquid at the moment, while banks are generally in a much better shape compared with the global financial crisis.



Source link

Leave a Reply